Isaiah and Ezekiel: Information in Metaphor

I tried to add this to a reblogged ask to @luciformspiral about mistranslation issues and Isaiah and whether Isaiah/the name Lucifer actually have anything to do with the entity we call Lucifer at all. But tumblr decided to make the formatting really fucking ugly. So this has to be a separate post.

Here is what I was replying to, and here is what I said:

Regarding the mistranslation issues– yes, Isaiah 14:12 is about the King of Babylon, but it’s also using a metaphor to talk about him. So we have to ask– what is the source of that metaphor? Who is he being compared to?

Let’s break it down.

12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

OK this is the KJV, and here’s that famous mistranslation– Lucifer son of the morning for Helel ben Shahar, which is “Helel, son of Shahar.”

Shahar was the god of the morning star in Ugarit mythology. Attar would then be the son of Shahar, and this is the entity that the King of Babylon was being compared to directly. Attar was also a god of the morning star/the planet Venus. (Fun fact: Attar has appeared as both male and female!)

The Vulgate used Lucifer, the name of the Roman god of the morning star, in the translation. Kinda random. But yes, that’s where we got the name Lucifer. So maybe we’re calling him by the wrong name– but that doesn’t mean a divine entity wasn’t talked about here.

Point is, the controlling metaphor here is comparing the King of Babylon to a divine entity, specifically a deity connected to the morning star/venus.

The King of Babylon obviously didn’t literally fall out of heaven. But in Helel/Attar/Lucifer did. So we can learn the story of this entity from the metaphor. Two stories are running paralell here– literal and metaphorical.

And here’s how the rest of Attar/Lucifer/Helel’s story goes, whatever name we call him by:

13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.

After that it kind of breaks out of metaphor, signaled by referring to the King as a man/human:

16 They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;

So 14:12-15 are the most potentially relevant verses.

Similarly, the verses in Ezekiel about the King of Tyre use a divine fallen angel/God metaphor to talk about a human man, and we can potentially learn about the God/angel from the metaphor being used about the king.

“You were the seal of perfection,
Full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
13 You were in Eden, the garden of God;
Every precious stone was your covering:
The sardius, topaz, and diamond,
Beryl, onyx, and jasper,
Sapphire, turquoise, and emerald with gold.
The workmanship of your timbrels and pipes
Was prepared for you on the day you were created.

14 “You were the anointed cherub who covers;
I established you;
You were on the holy mountain of God;
You walked back and forth in the midst of fiery stones.
15 You were perfect in your ways from the day you were created,
Till iniquity was found in you.

16 “By the abundance of your trading
You became filled with violence within,
And you sinned;
Therefore I cast you as a profane thing
Out of the mountain of God;
And I destroyed you, O covering cherub,
From the midst of the fiery stones.

17 “Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty;
You corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor;
I cast you to the ground,
I laid you before kings,
That they might gaze at you.

Obviously the King of Tyre was not literally in the garden of Eden. Nor was he a cherub. Nor was he cast literally out of the mountain of God. So who was? Again, who is he being compared to?

Heya! ^-^ I haz question! From what I can tell, and please correct me if I’m wrong, you’re viewing Lucifer and Satan as the same deity. But… isn’t this view ascribed to a translation error in the Septuagint? 🤔 I hope you don’t get this the wrong way. I’m not asking you to change your beliefs or anything, I’m just curious because I really don’t know any better. 😶 Here, have a cute chicken: 🐓

:

My beliefs aren’t entirely based in what scripture says. Much of it is personal. I used to believe that Lucifer and Satan were entirely separate beings, but I view the terms Lucifer and Satan less as names now and more as titles. The Lucifer I follow can also take on the role of a Satan, so I consider him both. Perhaps he wasn’t always, but it seems to be the case now.

The more I look inward and meditate, the more the lines between some forces seemed to blur a bit more and it helps me realize that I was over-categorizing aspects of someone rather than actually perceiving multiple beings. Lucifer is divine and divinity can be really, really big. Big enough to fit so many facets that to a human it might seem like different entities on the surface. So for me now, it’s hard to separate the idea of Lucifer from Satan in the sense that they are two large facets of the entire being that is Lucifer. That said, I don’t see a Satan as inherently evil.

That’s just my experience though, and I don’t expect anybody else to follow my lead. We all have different experiences and perspectives within Luciferianism and that’s one of the greatest parts about it.

I Went to School in the Cult of Michael

I have been needing to start this series of posts for awhile. Every single one of them will be convoluted and hard to write. Please be patient with me, I feel the need to reveal this part of my story and spiritual background. This first post will be long, but still only a crude overview. 

So: I went to school in a cult.

Now, there are cults and there are cults. This wasn’t a terribly abusive one. It was a damn expensive one, and it was also very immersive and consuming. My feelings about it aren’t completely negative. I have some positive memories and I took some good things from the experience. I look back on my education with a complex mixture of fondness, disgust, exasperation, amusement, contempt, and gratitude. 

Perhaps you’ve heard of Waldorf Schools. From the outside– and even from the inside, much of the time– they appear quaint and eccentric but basically innocent. The children aren’t allowed to watch TV or use computers. They do a silly looking form of interpretive dance called Eurythmy. When they are younger they play with little felt gnomes and draw with expensive beeswax crayons. When they get older, they participate in ancient Greek sports such as discus and javelin throwing. In sixth grade, everyone learns to ride a unicycle, for some reason. The classrooms are painted in soft, lovely colors, and each features a “nature table,” a sort of seasonal nature altar. Children don’t learn to read until they are in second grade. 

These are just a few of the harmless-seeming eccentricities of Waldorf schools. The media occasionally freaks out a little and runs sensationalist pieces accusing Waldorf, with its nature-altars and spiritualistic flavor, of “paganism.” Which is hilarious. Waldorf is many things, but it’s definitely not pagan. 

Surprisingly media-saavy Waldorf representatives are always at the ready to deftly counter such accusations. But if the writers of those critical pieces did just a teensy weensy little bit of research, they would encounter the real esoteric philosophy underpining all of Waldorf education– Anthroposophy. 

History time!

Setting: Europe, near the turn of the 20th century. Spiritualism and Theosophy are the big crazes. Holding seances in your parlor is a chic way to have a good time. 

Our “hero” is an Austrian dude called Rudolph Steiner. He’s involved with Theosophy for a little bit, but then decides to spin off and make his own occult religion. He calls it Anthroposophy. (”Theosophy” is “knowledge of God, “Anthroposophy” is “knowledge of man.” I am tempted to be a brat and start calling my shit “Diavolosophy” just for a tacky joke.) 

As far as I can tell, the basis of Steiner’s Anthroposophy is a heretical read of Christianity, ideas from Theosophy, random concepts like karma and reincarnation yanked from Hinduism, a big heaping helping of racism… and his own “clairvoyance.” 

(It’s actually really complex and esoteric. I went to Waldorf from kindergarten through 10th grade, so I have a pretty good foundation in the “surface” ideas of Anthroposophy and its core values, but they don’t tell us much about the actual occult concepts underneath. And I am resisting reading Steiner’s actual books, so much of my information so far comes from checking my experience against the site Waldorf Watch, which is heavy on the Steiner quotes and elaborately cited.)

To Steiner, Christ and the Archangel Michael (fun fact: we all had to pronounce it with three syllables, My-KYE-el) are the same entity, who is a “sun spirit.” Also reincarnation exists, and if you are really good, you end up reincarnating as a white, Aryan person. (There’s that big ol’ heaping of racism I promised! Way to appropriate a concept from Eastern culture and then use it to shit all over anyone who isn’t white.) 

Future reincarnations can be helped somehow by ritually waving your arms around, hence that weirdo dance called Eurythmy. 

DEMONS

Ahriman, a demon that Steiner associates with technology for some reason (actually a God from Zoroastrianism), is supposedly trying to force humans to abandon spirituality and exist on a physical plane. Hence the not watching TV or using computers thing. 

Oh yeah, also? In opposition to Ahriman, and yet somehow also working with him, is another demon. He’s trying to pull humans in the opposite direction– out of embodiment and into pure, overly theoretical intellectual and spiritual concepts. You might recognize that demon’s name. Just some fallen angel called Lucifer. (And he lives on the moon, or something, according to Steiner.)

To mediate between these demons, we need Michael/Christ, who according to Steiner cast down Lucifer in the form of the serpent of Eden, and does battle with Ahriman in the form of the Dragon. Waldorf students repeatedly watch little pageant plays about these two stories– The Paradise Play about the Fall from Eden, and the Michaelmas Play about Saint George and Michael defeating the Dragon. 

SO MUCH MICHAEL

Michael is a big fucking deal in Waldorf. Being conflated with Jesus helps, of course– but a lot of the focus is on the Michael aspect. 

We sang a shit-ton of little hymns and receited a bunch of “verses” (actually prayers, Steiner literally told his teachers to call the prayers “verses” so no one would realize his schools were religious) about Michael. Here are a few I remember.

Unconquered hero of the skies

Saint Michael

Against the foe with us arise 

Thine aid we pray

The foe to slay

Saint Michael 

The heavenly banner dost thou bear

Saint Michael

The angels do thine armor wear

Thine aid we pray

The foe to slay

Saint Michael 

Also: 

Michael with sword of light

Blaze in the darkness of earth’s long night

Archangel Michael with radiant glory shines above

Hero Michael will defeat the foe

(The first two lines of that one were sung as a counter melody against the second two lines. It was really pretty actually.)

Wind in the trees blows loud

For summer’s last song

Thrashing the branches

Pelting the leaves along 

Sleepers awake

Hark to the word of the wind

Breaking on summer’s dull drowsy spell

Show us the way

Point with thy spear before

Forge us the future

O Michael

That one was pretty as fuck, too. It was my favorite. I still catch myself singing it sometimes. 

There were more that I don’t remember in their entirety. There was a sort of crappy one that I think was an original composition by my teacher. I only remember the second verse:

From a little freshet something streams

Freshly new-mown hay and moonlit dreams

Float with water fairies down the streams

O Michael

O Michael

The dragon fell

The dragon fell 

Honestly, if you are a devotee of Michael and want the melodies of these songs for your use, I will fucking record them and send them to you. No hate. At least, not for actual Michael or his devotees. 

MICHAEL AND ARYANISM IN ANTHROPOSOPHY 

Unfortunately, though, hate is kind of part and parcel in Waldorf. According to Steiner we are now in the age of Michael, which supposedly started in November 1879. (Gabriel was in charge before.) Michael is here to guide us into our next stage of evolution. Sounds nice, right?

Well, for Steiner, evolution means Aryanism. In fact, according to Steiner, there should only be one race existing at any given period of time, and the continued existence of non-white races is the fault of Lucifer and Ahriman. (So, THANKS LUCIFER AND AHRIMAN! I have no fucking idea why Steiner thinks you’re the baddies, probably because he’s fucking racist.) By the way, reading the links about Steiner’s Aryanism can be really upsetting and triggering, if that wasn’t obvious. 

(If any of this sounds familiar, it might be because certain Aryan “Satanist” groups have really similar ideas about time spirits and entering an Aryan eon.)

Now, generally, they do not openly teach these ideas in Waldorf schools. The racism is more covert, but still not terribly subtle. Waldorf curricula are rightly under fire for being too “Eurocentric,” aka white supremacist. To which Waldorf apologists will point to the fact that students learn about Hinduism and Buddhism, for example!

Yes, it’s true that we learned a (probably bastardized Anthroposophical view) on Hinduism and Buddhism. We also learned the Torah, again through a similarly wack-ass pseudo-Christian lens. But what’s really telling is when we learned those things. 

You see, Waldorf children are taught about certain cultures in certain grades for a reason: because Steiner thought that children of a certain age were at the same level of sophistication as those civilizations. 

So for example, there was a lot of stuff about Native Americans when we were in fucking kindergarten. 

The Torah was for third grade. 

Hinduism and Buddhism came in fifth grade, the same year we were also learning Greek mythology. 

So yeah, for Steiner kindergarteners are the equivalent of all adult Native Americans. Third graders are at the level of the Hebrews. Etc. We never learned any African history or mythology at all– probably because racist asshole Steiner would have considered that to be at a pre-kindergarten level! 

When I was in school I had no idea why we were learning certain things at certain times. It’s only my adult reading that has revealed this part of the philosophy, and I am furious. 

The schools I went to were pretty damn white in terms of student body and also faculty. There was some diversity, but I realize now that a lot of gate-keeping was happening. The Eurocentric and Christian-flavored curriculum was generally a turn-off for Jews, Muslims and PoC, and the incredibly high tuition was of course an additional layer of racist/classist gate-keeping. 

I think I need to stop this overview post here. Next time, I’ll write more about what it’s like to be a clueless child inside of Waldorf– what Anthroposophy looks like on the ground, as it were. The picture I have painted here is obviously revolting, but it’s not the picture we were shown. In my next article, you’ll learn why Waldorf is so seductive– but also how it might be effecting small children.

vampireapologist:

Being a good person is a choice. Don’t let people fool you into believing that truly good people never have bad thoughts, are never tempted by the easier path, by the low road, never mess up or act out selfishly. Never believe a person can be good without making a conscious effort.

Every single time you do something good, you’ve made a decision to make the world a little brighter.

Goodness is not an inherent trait, it is a choice. Keep making it! I see you, I’m proud of you, and I’m rooting for you!

Period magick tea

witchysugarbabe:

Ingredients:
1 lemon
Ginger, powdered/ grated
Boiling water
Any crystals you want (think of their purpose)
Sugar, honey, or any other sweetener (optional)
Probably a mug or a cup but hey I don’t run ur life bb. You do you boo

Aight listen up u hormonal cranky angry grizzly queen (or king I don’t judge fam I’m a trans boy myself) . U gotta go turn on ya stove and boil some mf water. It can be moon water, sun water, whatever the fuck you want it’s just gotta be h2O fam.
Cut ya lemon in half and squeeze its nice ass juice into ya water b4 it boils. Keep the lemon tho we not done w/ it yet bb.

Grate ya ginger into a cup, add at least a few (3-4???) teaspoons if it’s fresh but if it’s powdered idk a teaspoon or two.

Aight now go lay out a crystal grid and put ya cup in the middle. Pour ya boiling water in there boo.

Yell at ur tea “fuck these cramps and bloody bullshit I’m fucking sick of ur shit uterus” to charge it w/ ur intent and then throw the entire lemon in it.

Add ur sweetener and enjoy bby

Update:if you give this notes I’ll follow u

luciformspiral:

brightestandbest:

luciformspiral:

brightestandbest:

luciferianbuddhism:

luciformspiral:

Just so it’s clear

this is not a kink blog.

I post about theistic & philosophical Luciferianism, and occasionally chaos magick. If your blog is 0% related content and 99% demon pinups, this isn’t the place for you. Blogs soliciting sexual partners online will be blocked on the spot.

However, if you do enjoy Luciferian content and just happen to also post about kink, that is fine. Just be aware you won’t find that here.

All of this ❤ same here. No kink.

If you want kink on your Luciferian blogs, I, on the other hand, will probably deliver that at some point. ❤

You heard it here: If you’re looking for kink and Lucifer, that’s the blog you want. ❤

Unfortunately it will probably be less sexxxy picz and more “thinky feels about being a Serious Leather Person into Lucifer” and “How the Constant Learning and Growth Required by Luciferianism is Mirrored by my Kink Journey”

Also: “Lucifer: A Sadomasochist?! More at 10.”

I greatly approve of this venture. Someone needs to explore this facet of Lucifer properly and I know you’re the person for the job.

Well look at least it will be a nice break from being That Luciferian who is willing to take one for the team and read ALL THE SCRIPTURE 

luciferianbuddhism:

I do not fear the fire. How could I not? I burn up and I am reborn from the ashes. I have walked through my own version of hell and came back stronger. I would do it again and again. I may not be able to have pure joy through the agony but I know it will pass. I know I will be even stronger than I was before.

I may bend but I will not break. I am unbreakable. I am diamond hard.

I fell hard but I learned to rule in hell.